Mobile Services In The Craft

December 12, 2014 at 5:52 pmCategory:General

Challenges of mobile resource management for the construction order processing small and medium-sized craft businesses have often little chance in the awarding of major projects because they lack the resources for such orders. Even worse, that the tendering of major projects is increasingly on electronic means; Since this year, even the standard should be this approach on the basis of EU policy in the public sector. Against this background makes the reading-hofer IAO with the project MAREMBA small and medium-sized craft businesses fit for large orders. With a focus on the electrical trade, it is the goal of MAREMBA, to tap the market potential of the large construction sites. Warnings have difficulties attracting income-securing orders them today increasingly typical size in the.

Increasingly craft firms have in this environment a disadvantage against corporations that Mischkalkulationen and a much broader resource base, as well as local presence in the Competition can occur differently. Here, cooperation is a survival necessity, to play a role beyond the extended work bench in the future. Intelligent E-collaboration solutions enable communication and coordination over distance, provide access to common knowledge and connect both people within a company, as well as across corporate boundaries. To solutions participate in how it can succeed on the tender and cooperative management of large projects, now displays the publication originated as part of the project MAREMBA – Mobile Assistant for resource management in the construction order processing on. Handwerbsbetriebe find in the publication answers on questions like: will reduce expenses for project coordination, without risking a loss of quality in the cooperation? What is the benefit it offers to avoid media discontinuities within the consortium of construction and if necessary, media applications involving the client? Under the motto Increase productivity and promote sustainability provides the publication contributions of practitioners and experts on current trends and future perspectives around the subject area networked cooperation on construction sites. The publication is available in the ILO-shop at shop.iao.fraunhofer.de for the price of 20. More Tobias Hug, Fraunhofer IAO

Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi

December 9, 2014 at 5:43 amCategory:General

Computers, however, are not paying for individuals. Under certain conditions to liberate GEZ fee can the broadcasting participants of the payment. So, as recipients of unemployment benefit II payment of the licence fees are exempt. To complete capture of all participants in broadcasting, broadcasters employ so-called licence officers who check on-site whether devices are correctly reported. This is generally to be observed: should you, meet a fees officer on your property before your House or apartment door, so you can refuse access to him.

The fees agents have no authority to enter against your will land, houses or apartments. Many leaders of the broadcasting fee proceed very cleverly, not imagine as GEZ, but say they are by the Norddeutscher Rundfunk”or another public service channel. It does though somewhere, because the GEZ is a company of the public service broadcaster and insist on the fees for this. However, this statement is of course aware misleading. In some cases going to the lawyer may be worth here, because it is everyone’s right to know who you can be in the apartment. In the meantime, the Minister-Presidents of the Federal States on broadcasting finance reform have agreed. The revision foresees to make subject to the emergence of a GEZ charge no longer by the existence of a radio broadcast. Basically every household should pay from 2013, including those where no receiver is.

Still, it should be possible to get rid of the fee under certain circumstances. The legal assessment by specialist solicitors and the corresponding courts pending. Critics contend GEZ fees allows a great competitive advantage for the public service broadcasters and not contribute to a balanced content. This evidence and others that bring to the audience-tough times only entertainment such as ARD and ZDF and high quality (political) sliding documentation in the night program. Others think that the GEZ their monopoly position in relation to the Exploit consumers too much. “Who is even known the GEZ, no longer gets rid of them”, others say, even if they had to pay in fact no GEZ fees more again (for example, if individuals pulling together). These criticisms certainly have their permission, the GEZ is certainly not Holy. But anyone who criticises E.g. the German television program should look to Italy: there, Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi dominated almost the entire TV content: he has a (political) influence on the State broadcaster, RAI and the private television group Mediaset with channels like Italia 1 belongs to him as a businessman. Such a scenario would be in Germany – GEZ-fees, dank-was unthinkable. Sonja Mayer