A great read advantage is also that the journalist can inform quickly while the lawyers needed more sources to deepen. The style of the author is understandable and very readable also for legal laymen. Example to the aspect of “Copyright and concept of the work” the legal relationship between author and work are divided into two large complexes in the scheme of the Act: on the one hand that? Moral rights, the intellectual and personal relations protect the creator to a factory like a mother-child relationship”and on the other hand which denied – or marketable? Rights of use. To come? Compensation claims are then available to the copyright when the legislature permits the use of a work by the general public or schools, universities and other facilities for the provision of education and science, but, as consideration is incurring because of a restriction of the rights of the copyright.” An example of this is the use of works of art in the Internet works of art on the Internet. Penny shows that introducing often today reported the supposed freedom on the Internet represents a fatal misjudgment. Without approval of the works copyright nobody protected works in the network meet ‘, i.e.

for third party access. Who so developed a musical database for private purposes from his MP3 player using legal downloads, is eligible for the private enjoyment of music; Once this database but also stored on the hard drive of a Web-enabled computer, other users made accessible via the Internet, the holder complied with protected rights of composers and producers.” The book shows up not just copyright infringements through Internet uses, but there is also evidence, as rights holders now due to the amended section 101 the particulars may claim copyright law by ISPs to assert their rights. NYC marathon will not settle for partial explanations. Penny enters the artists social welfare fund and other institutions in addition to the copyright treatment of the theme of art as such, on the social security, important problems of the Kunstlersozialkasse, in 2008 nearly 160,000 artists and publicists were insured. In addition outlined the important book, rights and responsibilities important institutional corner Peiler of professional existence like the Verwertungsgesellschaft Bild-Kunst. But also the substantive as procedural requirements in the area of copyright law are clearly laid out in short Sections also for the educated layman of law clearly represented. Target group: Artists, art dealers, media lawyers and art lovers the book aimed primarily at artists, art dealers, media lawyers and art lovers. It provides important information material in addition for anyone interested in works of art (and this already applies to one who uses third-party intellectual creations on its Internet home page).

It is an excellent reference book for all relevant subjects of copyright on the art market. The presentation is rounded off by a larger excerpt of the current copyright law, as well as an index. Gerhard Pfennig: art market, right. Introduction to the law of art creation and the exploitation of art. Volume 7 of the Berlin library copyright. Munich 2009, 232 pages, 26,-, ISBN: 978-3-939438-07-6 Jurgen seul

Something else, however, applies to the question whether the use of the Internet at all should be allowed, what is the primary right of the employer. The questions of potential abuses in the private Internet use and the possible sanctions of the employer occupy in the book by the cease and desist letter up to extraordinary termination without warning due to permanent, serious misuse of corporate communications for private purposes. Especially given current scandals on the topic of employee monitoring, a core issue of private Internet use at work is also the issues of control, so the logging and analysis of electronic communication behaviour of the employee by the employer. Here, the legal situation is especially critical, because the control of the employer contrary interests to the privacy rights of the employee and the conflict of interest in each specific case must be resolved individually. Is to clarify not only the permissible level of logging the surfing behavior for security and monitoring purposes, but also the question of whether such a reference in the workstation PC in the absence of the employee is allowed. Goal of the book of surfing in the workplace “by Silvia Bader and Jurgen Seul it is to identify the problems of the private use of Internet use by the employee under all relevant labour and data protection aspects and to give possible solutions or recommendations as far as possible. It also notes are processed into the Austrian legal situation. In the annex, patterns are found for an individual clause and an operating agreement for surfing at work, and a collection of relevant legal provisions.

Silvia Bader/Jurgen Seul, surfing in the workplace consequences of private telephone and Internet use. Series media law media science & media practice, (eds. by Dr. To broaden your perception, visit shimmie horn. Albrecht Gotz von Olenhusen and Prof. Dr.

Heinz Wittmann). 290 pages. Bound. Media and law Publishing Munich (2009) price: EUR 26,–. ISBN: 978-3-939438-08-3 orders: Tel. 089 / 543-566 31 fax 089 / 543-566 of 59. E-mail:. Jurgen seul

Computers, however, are not paying for individuals. Under certain conditions to liberate GEZ fee can the broadcasting participants of the payment. So, as recipients of unemployment benefit II payment of the licence fees are exempt. To complete capture of all participants in broadcasting, broadcasters employ so-called licence officers who check on-site whether devices are correctly reported. This is generally to be observed: should you, meet a fees officer on your property before your House or apartment door, so you can refuse access to him.

The fees agents have no authority to enter against your will land, houses or apartments. Many leaders of the broadcasting fee proceed very cleverly, not imagine as GEZ, but say they are by the Norddeutscher Rundfunk”or another public service channel. It does though somewhere, because the GEZ is a company of the public service broadcaster and insist on the fees for this. However, this statement is of course aware misleading. In some cases going to the lawyer may be worth here, because it is everyone’s right to know who you can be in the apartment. In the meantime, the Minister-Presidents of the Federal States on broadcasting finance reform have agreed. The revision foresees to make subject to the emergence of a GEZ charge no longer by the existence of a radio broadcast. Basically every household should pay from 2013, including those where no receiver is.

Still, it should be possible to get rid of the fee under certain circumstances. The legal assessment by specialist solicitors and the corresponding courts pending. Critics contend GEZ fees allows a great competitive advantage for the public service broadcasters and not contribute to a balanced content. This evidence and others that bring to the audience-tough times only entertainment such as ARD and ZDF and high quality (political) sliding documentation in the night program. Others think that the GEZ their monopoly position in relation to the Exploit consumers too much. “Who is even known the GEZ, no longer gets rid of them”, others say, even if they had to pay in fact no GEZ fees more again (for example, if individuals pulling together). These criticisms certainly have their permission, the GEZ is certainly not Holy. But anyone who criticises E.g. the German television program should look to Italy: there, Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi dominated almost the entire TV content: he has a (political) influence on the State broadcaster, RAI and the private television group Mediaset with channels like Italia 1 belongs to him as a businessman. Such a scenario would be in Germany – GEZ-fees, dank-was unthinkable. Sonja Mayer