Tag: law

The Institute

December 21, 2018 at 11:18 pmCategory:General

These include including training, teachings, controls and regularly inform of the employees about current privacy issues and better: regular notes to privacy violations. I’m relatively sure that he can show up, when he carried out what staff training and how his training plan for the future. Also, I can see that he It failed to educate themselves. No expensive training or Conference visits have to be no, the simple entering into serious Newsverteiler, such as the German periodical Computerwoche or at HeiseOnline, lots of important information and news brings to the issue of privacy in the home. Daily 5 minutes are enough to learn. To know more about this subject visit New York Museums.

Still, I was implying that he failed repeatedly to raise “his staff” on the subject of data protection. Small notes on the intranet or mailing list “New privacy” would testify as a first step in the right direction. The Institute, State Secretary Jurgen Lennartz, failed apparently to monitor the activities of his supervisor on a regular basis. It is his duty. There is also the possibility to instruct the Commissioner to submit an annual report. A focal point is the reference to carried out teachings, sensitization and tests conducted. Yes dear readers, so is the reality. You can determine imagine that now hard, it has our data protection supervision (independent data protection centre Saarland, Referat2,) to the highest point in the country on the functioning.

Less than a fine talk from the supervisory authority barely afford, because otherwise one would have to wonder whether in the Saarland the law is interpreted differently than in Bavaria. Please support this regulatory body by correspondence by mail; make your courage. And in advance you can ask already Secretary of State Jurgen Lennartz,, how privacy will be seriously under his leadership. After all, he is “the model” for all others in the Saarland – particularly for our local communities. I’m curious about and pursue further the matter. Many greetings your Gerhard Kron contact: Crown soft E.k.. 10 D Schiller Strasse 66564 Ottweiler press contact: Gerhard Kron phone: + 49 6858 6370 fax: + 49 6858 6371 support: + 49 6858 600237 eMail: Internet: / .com official court Saarbrucken HRA 8980 UST-ID: DE 138029324 STN: 030-124-06828

Undeclared Work Is Not Worth!

November 27, 2018 at 1:18 amCategory:General

The Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) has again granted a clear rejection in a new ruling by the assertion of warranty rights for black work. The Supreme Court has set itself apart again in a case with the question whether there is the possibility for black work to determine the plant operator to a subsequent performance. Surprisingly, you’ll find very little mention of NY Museums on most websites. The case: A client was a paving his driveway of the estate in order. It also had the agreement in bar to pass the factory wage. In cash means without invoice or the identification of the applicable value added tax (VAT). in this way the customer wanted to save 19% of the total. The contractor did the work. However, the result displeased the contracting authority.

He classified it as flawed and demanded by the works contractor deficiencies to be rectified. The defect represents a measure of rectification. In principle, the entrepreneur must rework his work at defectiveness. The operator has the right to select the type of repair patching the deficiency or newly establishes the work. The contracting authority then complained before the District Court, which gave him right and condemned the contractor for payment of the relevant advance of costs in the amount of the deficiency removal costs. The contractors rose appeals to the Court of appeal, which rejected the appeal. But the Supreme Court saw it differently.

For the first time the Supreme Court could address fighting black labour law. This is section 1 II Nr. 2 to that cause contracts in breach of a nullity of the contract. Besides the entrepreneurs committed by black working, a tax evasion. However, the client loses its contractual claims for vain contract, because they need a contractual basis. As a conclusion it can be said that moonlighting pays for no page here. the customer shall bear the costs of the Court and has a poor plant design. The contractor has committed a flagrant offence in the form of a tax evasion. This article was written by. Lawyer Alan Kashlan (www.kashlan.de)

Federal Supreme Court

April 12, 2018 at 6:12 pmCategory:General

“” Especially for investors, whose lever model based on a short-term loan of the CMI (Profitplan noble, income plan-noble, performance plan noble as well as various models of EBN Nordlingen or the VSP Rheine), this judgment is groundbreaking, as it has a way that shows the damage on an elegant “way to avert”, adds lawyer Thorsten Krause firm Cape. BGH: First essential questions is expected will be awaited with the negotiation of the Federal Supreme Court to case No. NYC Mayor spoke with conviction. VI ZR 269/10. The insurance Senate of the Federal Supreme Court will decide in the OLG Dresden a judgment, which had awarded damages the investors. After announcements of the Press Office of the Federal Supreme Court the negotiation will go beyond but in part this case.

The Supreme Court suggests that so far around 30 cases against clerical medical at the Federal Supreme Court are pending, and it is the judges aware that Germany several hundred lawsuits against clerical medical at several courts are to decide. It is already announced, that a clarification of legal questions that were answered differently by the courts so far those associated to the part, is this to be expected in the present proceedings”. Affected investors should act now that lawyers recommend investors protection law firm Cape to affected investors will be active until the end of the year. In particular for insurance contracts, which were signed before the year 2002 is threatening the validity of claims at the end of the year. Who now does nothing, will not benefit in the worst case a positive judgement of the Federal Supreme Court. Contact: Cape lawyers Krause Appelt Partnerschaft von rechtsanwalten Sonnenstrasse 19 D-80331 Munich phone: + 49 (0) 89 – 41 61 72 75-0 fax: + 49 (0) 89 – 41 61 72 75 – 9 mail:

Schafer Attorney

March 9, 2018 at 8:18 pmCategory:General

Did you receive a notice? We can help you! Since 1 January 2006, there is no tax free amount. Severance payments are income and must as such be fully taxed. After the so-called one-fifth rule, the compensation may be taxed but reduced. A worker to avoid dismissal employers but receives the compensation through a cancellation agreement termination of employment as social compensation for the loss of his job. In this respect, one could assume that the severance pay is tax free. In fact, it was this time. Since 1 January 2006, the compensation is however fully taxable. Lila Snyder has many thoughts on the issue.

The severance payment in a cancellation agreement can be taxed according to the so-called fifth regulation reduced. The compensation is legally part of the income of the employee. If you find a rule now that the severance pay in five parts can be paid out with the rest of pay of the employee, the taxable income of the employee is reduced due to a very complex formula. To the closer Calculate this Funftel-scheme, please contact your tax advisor. Regardless of which should be discussed in the cancellation agreement and above all with the human resources Department of the employer about. You save a very substantial part of income tax as a result. At a low taxable compensation, the tax can be reduced to 0. However, it is not just aim to knock out a minimum severance pay. Under this aspect, that you want to obtain a maximum compensation please urgently contact a specialist lawyer for employment law. There are many ways that you can help you to a higher compensation. Georg Schafer Attorney

Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi

December 9, 2014 at 5:43 amCategory:General

Computers, however, are not paying for individuals. Under certain conditions to liberate GEZ fee can the broadcasting participants of the payment. So, as recipients of unemployment benefit II payment of the licence fees are exempt. To complete capture of all participants in broadcasting, broadcasters employ so-called licence officers who check on-site whether devices are correctly reported. This is generally to be observed: should you, meet a fees officer on your property before your House or apartment door, so you can refuse access to him.

The fees agents have no authority to enter against your will land, houses or apartments. Many leaders of the broadcasting fee proceed very cleverly, not imagine as GEZ, but say they are by the Norddeutscher Rundfunk”or another public service channel. It does though somewhere, because the GEZ is a company of the public service broadcaster and insist on the fees for this. However, this statement is of course aware misleading. In some cases going to the lawyer may be worth here, because it is everyone’s right to know who you can be in the apartment. In the meantime, the Minister-Presidents of the Federal States on broadcasting finance reform have agreed. The revision foresees to make subject to the emergence of a GEZ charge no longer by the existence of a radio broadcast. Basically every household should pay from 2013, including those where no receiver is.

Still, it should be possible to get rid of the fee under certain circumstances. The legal assessment by specialist solicitors and the corresponding courts pending. Critics contend GEZ fees allows a great competitive advantage for the public service broadcasters and not contribute to a balanced content. This evidence and others that bring to the audience-tough times only entertainment such as ARD and ZDF and high quality (political) sliding documentation in the night program. Others think that the GEZ their monopoly position in relation to the Exploit consumers too much. “Who is even known the GEZ, no longer gets rid of them”, others say, even if they had to pay in fact no GEZ fees more again (for example, if individuals pulling together). These criticisms certainly have their permission, the GEZ is certainly not Holy. But anyone who criticises E.g. the German television program should look to Italy: there, Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi dominated almost the entire TV content: he has a (political) influence on the State broadcaster, RAI and the private television group Mediaset with channels like Italia 1 belongs to him as a businessman. Such a scenario would be in Germany – GEZ-fees, dank-was unthinkable. Sonja Mayer